Mor receives highest faculty honor from Brown University

Vincent Mor, PhD,  IMPACT Multiple  Principal Investigator and longtime professor of health services, policy and practice at Brown University, was one of two recipients of the Susan Colver Rosenberger Medal of Honor during Brown’s graduation service on May 2nd.

Mor was recognized for the “stunning impact” of his service, leadership and research over four decades at Brown, as well as for his devotion to the health and well-being of individuals and to the public good.   Mor was just the 33rd person to receive this honor since its establishment in 1919.

A longtime advocate for vulnerable elders, Mor directed the Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research at Brown for 10 years, and he has been principal investigator of more than 40 National Institutes of Health-funded grants focused on the uses and outcomes of health services by frail and chronically ill people. During the COVID-19 pandemic, in recognition of the urgency of his research, Mor and his team have been awarded multiple supplemental grants related to COVID-19 testing and the adverse health impacts of COVID-19 vaccination in elderly nursing home residents.

Mor said before Sunday’s ceremony that he is deeply honored to receive the award with Julie Strandberg and hopes that their separate efforts at building significant programs at Brown will have lasting value: “What we’ve built, in our respective fields, lays the groundwork for future scholarship and societal improvement,” he said.

Read the full announcement from Brown University at this link.

Notice of Intent (NOI) to publish a new funding opportunity announcement for upcoming IMPACT Pilot Grants

The NIA IMPACT Collaboratory plans to publish a Request for Applications (RFA) for Pilot Grants on August 16, 2021 with Letters of Intent due September 17, 2021.

IMPACT funds several one-year awards of pilot pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) that test non-pharmacological interventions embedded in health care system(s) for people living with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) and AD-related dementias (ADRD) and their care partners. Under this mechanism, interventions must be linked to the needs of a health care system. More information on the IMPACT Pilot Grants Program can be found here.

The goal of the pilot projects is to generate the preliminary data necessary to design and conduct a future full-scale Stage IV effectiveness ePCT (based on the NIH Stage Model). The IMPACT Collaboratory will give preference to applications that address dementia care for populations traditionally marginalized or underrepresented in clinical trials and those that promote health equity. It is anticipated that Pilot Projects will be funded for up to $175,000 in direct costs for a maximum of 12-months.

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory to host special diversity workshop series

The NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory is launching a special workshop series on its popular Grand Rounds program to explore the inclusion of diverse participants in pragmatic clinical trials. This series will include topics on increasing engagement of diverse participants and building trust, including diverse sites, learning from implementation science to maximize diversity, and developing a pipeline of trainees from underrepresented groups to be leaders in pragmatic clinical research. The seminar on June 25 will include Jonathan Jackson, PhD, member of the IMPACT Health Equity Team.

The webinar series will kick off on Friday, May 14, at 1 p.m. ET with a keynote presentation by Dr. Clyde Yancy, Vice Dean of Diversity and Inclusion and Chief of Cardiology in the Department of Medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

The series will include four moderated webinar discussions with panels of experts, wrapping up with a podcast discussion in August. Download the Diversity Workshop Series Flyer and see the full schedule below. All sessions are free and open to the public; no registration required. Recordings will be archived on the Grand Rounds website.

 

woman standing at Grand Canyon

Mission Moment: Dr. Brenda Nicholson on Living with Dementia During COVID-19

woman standing at Grand CanyonBrenda Nicholson, MD, a member of the IMPACT Collaboratory Stakeholder Engagement Team Executive Committee and person living with dementia, shares her reflections on living with dementia in the context of COVID-19. Dr. Nicholson’s talk was the mission moment for the IMPACT Collaboratory Steering Committee & Business Planning Meeting on April 6, 2021.  Dr. Nicholson shares her unique experience living with dementia and provides a valuable perspective into the feelings of both people living with dementia and their care partners.

 

 

Watch the Video

Inclusion, diversity, and equity in pragmatic clinical trials

April 2020 – In Grand Rounds 16, Dr. Wilkins discusses the definitions of inclusion, diversity and equity in pragmatic clinical trials, and offers insight into how research can be more inclusive and diverse.

Webinar Slides

Speaker

Consuelo H. Wilkins, MD, MSCI

Consuelo H. Wilkins, MD, MSCI
Vice President for Health Equity, VUMC
Associate Dean for Health Equity, Vanderbilt SOM
Associate Director, Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Science
Professor of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine

Webinar Recording

Hey and Taljaard co-authors on review of pragmatic clinical trials

A review of pragmatic trials found a high degree of diversity in design and scope, deficiencies in reporting and trial registry data, and poor indexing

March 28, 2021

IMPACT Collaboratory members Spencer Hey, PhD and Monica Taljaard, PhD are among the authors of a review of pragmatic clinical trials recently published online in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and covered in a blog post from the US GRADE network. The first author of the study is Stuart G. Nicholls, PhD, of the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute.

The researchers identified 4,337 eligible trials in their review of data collected from MEDLINE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and full text between January 2014 and April 2019. They found diversity in research areas, but only 22% of the trials identified were labeled as pragmatic in the title, abstract or full text of the document. In addition, the authors estimated one-fifth of trials under-accrued by at least 15%. They concluded that there is a need to improve reporting of pragmatic trials and quality of trial registry data. Under accrual remains a challenge in pragmatic RCTs despite calls for more streamlined recruitment approaches.

The US GRADE Network blog developed an infographic to share the findings of the review.

view image larger
Source: US GRADE Network Blog