Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-Based Dementia Care Using Embedded Pragmatic Trials
June 26, 2020

June 2020 – Grand Rounds 7, members of IMPACT's Patient Caregiver Relevant Outcomes Core describe person and caregiver-centered outcome measurement in AD/ADRD ePCTs, give an overview of how outcomes are mapped to care domains, and highlight the methodological challenges present in AD/ADRD and pragmatic research.
Laura C. Hanson, MD, MPH
Core Leader, Patient/Caregiver Relevant Outcomes Core
Member, Steering Committee
Professor, Division of Geriatric Medicine
Director, UNC Palliative Care Program
University of North Carolina School of Medicine
Sheryl Zimmerman, PhD
Executive Committee, Patient/Caregiver Relevant Outcomes (PCRO) Core
University Distinguished Professor and Co-Director, Program on Aging, Disability, and Long-Term Care, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
The IMPACT PCRO iLibraries hold organized information on selected outcome measures for pragmatic trials enrolling people living with Alzheimer’s disease or related dementias (AD/ADRD). They are designed to support the overall goal of the IMPACT Collaboratory – to build capacity to conduct embedded pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs) to improve outcomes for people living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners.
Click on one of the links above to learn more about either the Administrative Sources or Clinical Assessments iLibrary.

April 2020 – In Grand Rounds 5, Drs. Quiñones and Jackson discuss health equity issues have not yet been fully considered, assessed, or integrated into ePCT designs. Health disparities populations may not be well represented in ePCTs without special efforts to identify and successfully recruit sites of care that serve larger numbers of these populations.
AcademyHealth has developed a report focused on information needs of the health care and community organizations engaged in the COVID-19 response. The report is intended to inform decision-making of federal and foundation funders of health services research to guide investments in responsive research.
Read the full report and background information on the AcademyHealth website.

February 2020 – In Grand Rounds 4, Dr. Karlawish discusses waivers and alterations of written informed consent in pragmatic clinical trials (ePCTs). He provides two case studies of ePCTs to determine whether or not it is appropriate to permit a modification or a waiver of research informed consent.

Jason Karlawish, MD
Core Leader, Ethics & Regulation Core
Professor of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology
Co-Director, Penn Memory Center, University of Pennsylvania
Additional Resources

December 2019 – In Grand Rounds 2, Dr. Taljaard describes the use of stepped wedge design in cluster randomized trials (SW-CRT), a novel research design embraced by clinical researchers.
Related Articles and Resources